Search Right-Wing Genius's Blog

Tuesday, June 28, 2011

The Jon Stewart/FOX News Tit-for-Tat That Just Won't End

It's been nine days since diminuitive Jewish comedian Jon Stewart appeared on FOX News Sunday w/ Chris Wallace. If you haven't seen the whole interview, then I highly recommend you watch it here.
As much as FOX News hyped this interview, the pre-interview hype was nothing compared to the flurry of analysis that permeated the blogoshpere and TV airwaves, especially on cable, in the immediate aftermath. I would very much like to do a play-by-play breakdown of every pertinent segment on FOX News and The Daily Show since the interview, but that would be far too time-consuming to hold most people's attention. Instead, suffice it to say that, on the day after the interview aired, Stewart led his program with it. Apparently, he felt that the lead take-away from the interview was Chris Wallace's "admission" of FOX News's "bias." Stewart played a clip from the interview in which he asked Wallace if he thought "that FOX News is exactly the ideological equivalent of NBC News," and Chris responded that he thought FOX News was "the counterweight," saying, "I think that they have a liberal agenda, and I think we tell the other side of the story, but, since this is my show, I'm asking the questions."
In a hypertechnical and not-at-all funny critique of Wallace, Stewart tried to argue that by saying that FOX News tells "the other side of the story," C.W. had implicitly confessed that FOX News tells only one side of the story. According to Jon, "FOX News isn't fair and balanced. It's balancing the system, man!"
I should pause for a moment here and reveal a little bit about where I'm coming from. I started watching The Daily Show and The Colbert Report at almost exactly the same time that I started watching FOX News regularly (late 2006). When I want to get the left-wing viewpoint, I prefer Stewart and Colbert to MSNBC (because they're not as visceral and vitriolic) and CNN (because they're more interesting). Frankly, I think Stewart is really funny when he wants to be, but like a lot of comedians, he falls flat when he lets his ideology infect his humor. He has a very creative staff of writers; the only cheap shot I'll take at him is that I think he's more dependent on his writers than Colbert, but I could be wrong. (He did all right during the writers' strike of '07-'08.)
As for FOX, I personally do not believe that FOX News has a right-wing bias, and no sane person can believe that it's a propaganda outfit (like MSNBC). However, I do think it would be good if FOX News had one hour-long opinion/news analysis program hosted by a left-winger. (Juan Williams occasionally hosting The O'Reilly Factor doesn't count.) I must also admit that I don't mind MSNBC operating as a propaganda network; I don't even mind its anchors' stubborn and at times laughable insistence that they work for a serious news organization. I watch MSNBC periodically for much the same reason(s) that people like to go to the zoo and watch lesser-evolved primates hurl their feces at one another.
Now, then, back to Stewart's latest pique with FNC. After the interview and Stewart's subsequent send-up, PolitiFact got involved. For those of you who aren't familiar with this organization, it's a non-partisan web site known for its "Truth-O-Meter"®, which it uses to rate the accuracy of political claims. PolitiFact National is run by editors and reporters from the St. Petersburg Times, a newspaper I read whenever I'm in St. Petersburg. The PolitiFact state sites are run by news organizations that have partnered with the Times. Their purported mission is "sorting out the truth in politics." I'm not prepared to assert that the site has a political bias, but several of its ratings have given me reason to doubt its credibility. (For example, on the June 26, 2011, edition of ABC’s This Week with Christiane Amanpour, Rep. James Clyburn (D-SC) said that Democrats "do not want to raise anybody's tax rates. That's never been on the table." PolitiFact rated Clyburn's blatantly false claim "Barely True," which, according to the Principles of PolitiFact and the Truth-O-Meter, means "an element of truth mixed with a lot of misinformation." Yet, this is the same rating it gave Congresswoman Michele Bachmann's demonstrably true claim that, "under Barack Obama, the last two years, the number of federal limousines for bureaucrats has increased 73 percent.") See, in his interview on FOX News Sunday, Jon stated emphatically that "FOX viewers" are "the most consistently misinformed media viewers," according to "every poll." PolitiFact rated Stewart's claim "False." Then, on last Tuesday's Daily Show, Jon Stewart accepted PolitiFact's "False" verdict and said, "I defer to their judgment, and I apologize for my mistake. To not do so would be irresponsible, and if I were to continue to [bla bla bla]." But alas, he just couldn't let it go. Stewart needed some sour grapes to wash the taste of crow out of his mouth, so he proceeded to fire off what he dubbed a "21-Lie Salute" to FOX News, rattling off a long list of claims seen/made on/by FOX News that received a "False" rating or worse. I spotted several issues with the items Stewart featured on his show, so I went to the PolitiFact web site to see how they explained their various classifications of what seemed to me to be either at least partially true statements or opinions that can't technically be assigned a truth value. There's a lot of material to go over, so I'll publish my criticism in a separate piece.
Anywho, Chris Wallace closed out his show this past Sunday by calling attention to Stewart's specious spin on his remark about telling "the other side of the story." Predictably, he told his viewers that "I wish I had said, 'the full story.'" (Stewart interpreted this as Wallace saying, "I accidentally told the truth and wish I could take it back.") He then proceeded to give a specific example of how FOX News tells both sides of the story when other networks don't, citing FOX News's coverage of the astonishingly poor response of the federal, state and local governments to the devastated Mississippi River Delta region in the wake of Hurricane Katrina. While the mainstream media was busy highlighting how FEMA dropped the ball (in what I'm sure was a bona fide attempt at hard-hitting journalism and not at all a cynical hit job on the Bush Administration), FOX News made sure its viewers were informed about who all bore responsibility for the abysmal response, including the bumbling mayor of New Orleans, Ray Nagin (D), and the administration of Gov. Kathleen Babineaux Blanco (D). Stewart did not seem to care for that. The following night on The Daily Show, he played a few short clips of Wallace's comments and supplemented them with his own brand of derisive mockery. He tried to somehow bolster his by now thoroughly discredited claims that FOX News is not "fair & balanced" by playing a clip of William LaJeunesse reporting on the "Operation Fast and Furious" fiasco. Apparently, Jon took issue with LaJeunesse's remark that some say the operation was an innocent mistake. "Others believe it was allowed to happen to justify tougher gun laws in the U.S." Jon cut the clip off right after that last syllable. He was very excited. "Did you see that?" he exclaimed with childish delight. "He just threw it right in there. President Obama is either incompetent, making an innocent mistake, or the architect of an evil conspiracy to wreak violent carnage in Mexico as a way to take away Americans' guns." Flashing a cheesy grin, he added, "You know, both sides of the story." Then, feigning exasperation, he said, "Who said that America was involved in the type of conspiracy that, if true, could ultimately lead to the impeachment of a president? Who said it? [dumb voice] Others."
Yes, Jon, “others,” like NRA CEO Wayne LaPierre. (Seriously, who told you to use that as an example? Do you know how easy it was for me to find someone who suggested that this could be part of an sinister plot by the Obama Administration to push a political agenda? I just typed "ATF agent fired" into a search engine. I wasn't even looking for someone who made that claim; I was just trying to get the name of the operation right. This was one of the first videos that popped up!)
Stewart took some more shots at Wallace and FOX News in general, but at this point, I'm actually feeling sorry for the little guy (despite him having nearly everything I want out of life but haven't attained yet, viz. a great job, his own TV show, an adoring fan base, a wife & kids). So, I'll close this out with his parting shot at the man he actually called "a friend of mine" as he insulted the man's employer. Said Stewart, "you know what this whole victim thing makes FOX? Well, perhaps this term a friend of mine used once to describe our current presidential administration is most apt."
Cut to: clip of Wallace telling Bill O'Reilly, "They are the biggest bunch of crybabies I have dealt with in my 30 years in Washington."
Tomorrow: the back-and-forth continues as Bernie Goldberg calls Jon Stewart a racist, and Stewart ... well, he does something to himself "with his own mouth." That's all I'll tell you for now. I'll also have some boring commentary on economics or some crap.

5 comments:

  1. Ugh..do you..do you really want to do this? I have a feeling anything I try to tell you you'll just ignore..and then probably accuse me of being a..spy, or something. I don't know. Should I even bother? You tell me. I'm not allowed to participate in partisan politics, I am not associated with either party. But I'm not going to get involved with a dialogue if you're just going to ignore everything I say that you don't agree with. Reading your post, I find that to be a strong possibility.

    ReplyDelete
  2. @wombatwolf:
    What do U want 2 tell me? I'm interested, but your whole post seems to be an explanation of your reticence 2 say anything on pt.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I've had a lot of experience trying to talk to people about this kind of thing, and I find it's usually easier just to make sure they're going to listen before I say anything. Anyway--I appreciate and greatly respect your fact checking in regards to Stewart's comments. I just started watching the show, and actually found the clip you specified by chance on the internet. This is the statement I have a problem with--"As for FOX, I personally do not believe that FOX News has a right-wing bias, and no sane person can believe that it's a propaganda outfit (like MSNBC)."

    Fox News has a right-wing bias. It's as bad if not worse than MSNBC. There is no getting around it. Here's where I have a problem with them. This is how you do news-----THIS IS THE EVENT. THIS IS WHAT HAPPENED AT THE EVENT. THIS IS ONE PERSON'S OPINION ON THE EVENT. THIS IS AN OPPOSING VIEW ON THE EVENT. MAYBE HERE'S A LITTLE PERSONAL COMMENTARY BY ME, EXPLICITLY STATED AS OPINION.----------That is how you do news. That is not what MSNBC does, and that is certainly not what Fox does. I can't bring up Daily Show or Colbert, because they're not news shows and don't claim to be, they're political satire. Fox deserves nearly all the flak it gets. They invite guests of opposing viewpoints but never let them speak, instead they just yell at them. Nearly everything they can possibly relate to being Obama's fault is Obama's fault. The earthquake in Japan for some reason was Obama's fault. The week of high gas prices were Obama's fault. I don't like Obama, but you CANNOT have a network that says nothing at all but smears and smears on a person and gives no other side of the story not a "balanced" network. What's bad is that...no one watches MSNBC. No one cares. It's on a fringe channel and it's just...no one watches it. Fox, on the other hand, is EXTREMELY public and therefore a lot more concerning. ------
    ------That's all I really need to say, that one statement you made really bugged me, is all. I know, as you've stated, that you personally watch other networks, which is fantastic. But others don't. They only watch Fox. And that concerns me.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Thanks 4 developing ur thoughts. I see where U R coming from, but I have to disagree w/ your characterization of FOX. Every show on FOX, even the "Opinion" shows, present opposing viewpoints, but the hosts DON'T "just yell at them." Let me give U an example of the difference between FOX News & MSNBC, as I see it. U may have heard about Indiana restricting Medicaid $$$ from going to Planned Parenthood as long as their clinics continue to provide abortions. Well, a week or 2 ago, Rachel Maddow did a lengthy segment on the subject w/ just 1 guest, the head of Planned Parenthood in Indiana. Last night, on the O'Reilly Factor, Laura Ingraham covered the story and had on 2 guests: Lila Rose from LiveAction (a pro-life group) and some pro-Planned Parenthood woman I didn't recognize named Sally something. Both women were allowed to speak for about the same amt. of time. U rarely, if ever, see that kind of balance on MSNBC.
    If FOX News really was a right-wing outfit, then I would agree w/ you that they're more dangerous than MSNBC, because, as U said, no one watches MSNBC.
    Thanks 4 writing. Please check back often, and share the site w/ ur friends.

    ReplyDelete
  5. If you want to use La Pierre's statement on June 22nd to explain that La Jeunesse's reporting on June 13th (your link is from June 17th and not the clip used on the Daily Show) was claiming a valid source, please make sure that June 22nd came before June 13th...
    http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/mon-june-27-2011/oh--for-fox-sake
    In case you didn't have it.

    ReplyDelete